@yisraeldov @codeberg I need to say that I like Sourcehut more than Codeberg. The email workflow is just better in my opinion, but I think that most contributors don't know, and don't want to learn, how to use this workflow.
I migrated a Github project with a lot contributors to Sourcehut and all of them stopped to contribute because of the email workflow 😟
It's important to me that people will actually find and feel comfortable to contribute.
That's why I think Codeberg could be good.
git, by its self is a great tool and I wish people would learn how to use it.
We just keep re-inventing the wheel.
@tychosoft @codeberg yeah, I can start my blog with a post about this change 🙂
They're working on CI:
But while they don't implement this I will try to integrate a CI running on my server.
Hmm, in short: We want to set up Woodpecker with Gitea integration as a hosted service for Codeberg and give projects access to it on demand (at first, and see how it evolves). We're looking into some resource control and how to allow projects to only automatically build pulls of authorized users to avoid abuse (e.g. for Cryptomining, they often send a pull which executes a script and takes the credits of FLOSS projects)
... can see some recent commits from the Codeberg team https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/pulse/monthly
One of our developers is now even a member of Woodpecker, very proud of this collaboration ...
There is no real timeline, we're experimenting with new deployment methods, the server setup and Woodpecker and see how fast we can make it into an Alpha phase 🙂
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!